Re: ISO 15924

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 10:47:21 CDT

Next message: Christopher Fynn: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"

Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: ISO 15924"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 16:49 +0200 2004-05-24, Philippe Verdy wrote:
>From: "Michael Everson" <everson@evertype.com>
>> Are there any further comments on the beta tables?
>
>Beside the typo "traditionel" (instead of the correct "traditionnel")

-> variante traditionnelle

>and the French name for "Ge'ez" which should be
>"guèze" according to ISO639, I have no more
>comments.

Février gives ge'ez. Meillet gives both ge'ez and guèze though.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Christopher Fynn: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Previous message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: ISO 15924"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 24 2004 - 10:48:17 CDT