Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?

From: John Hudson ([email protected])
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 13:51:30 CDT

Next message: D. Starner: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Michael Everson wrote:

> We have statements from real Semiticists who do not want their names
> dropped into this fray that they support the encoding of Phoenician as a
> separate and distinct script from Square Hebrew.

Are these statements going to be registered as documents? It would be nice to know what
reasons are given.

John Hudson

-- 
Tiro Typeworks        www.tiro.com
Vancouver, BC        [email protected]
Currently reading:
Typespaces, by Peter Burnhill
White Mughals, by William Dalrymple
Hebrew manuscripts of the Middle Ages, by Colette Sirat

Next message: D. Starner: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 24 2004 - 13:52:19 CDT