RE: PH technical issues (was RE: Why Fraktur is irrelevant

From: Peter Constable (
Date: Fri May 28 2004 - 17:26:36 CDT

  • Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "RE: PH technical issues (was RE: Why Fraktur is irrelevant"

    > From: Peter Kirk []

    > But I was thinking in
    > terms of tailored collation weights for the Unicode collation

    And moreover (adding to comments in my previous message), it seems
    *very* likely to me that, on those occasions when the Semitic
    paleographer is going to need to fold characters, they're going to deal
    with it not by UCA tailoring but by converting the Phoenician characters
    (as they would more often with Latin characters) to Hebrew characters.

    Peter Constable
    Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
    Microsoft Windows Division

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 28 2004 - 17:27:33 CDT