Re: Updated Phoenician proposal: confidential?

From: Rick McGowan (
Date: Wed Jun 02 2004 - 16:28:14 CDT

  • Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"

    Peter Kirk wrote..

    > > You, Rick, also replied on 22 December 2003 to the same posting
    > > of mine, so you can't claim to be ignorant of this discussion.
    > > You wrote:
    >You can't just "call for a review" and expect anything to happen.
    >Please dcument your opinions and document some facts. If you have
    >a different model of Aramaic, Phoenician, and related scripts,...

    Ah yes, I'd forgotten about that earlier discussion. You called for a
    review, but you never submitted any model document to UTC.

    Anyway, this Phoenician discussion has become pretty old and isn't going
    much of anywhere on this list, so I'll sign off for now.


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 16:29:12 CDT