Re: Roman numismatic marks

From: Mark E. Shoulson (mark@kli.org)
Date: Tue Jun 08 2004 - 18:37:27 CDT

Next message: Ernest Cline: "Re: Roman numismatic marks"

Previous message: Anousak Souphavanh: "UNICODE Lao translation?"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Roman numismatic marks"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: Roman (and other) numismatic marks"
Reply: Doug Ewell: "Re: Roman (and other) numismatic marks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Michael Everson wrote:

>
> Krause used "Mo" because there was no other plain-text way to show
> M-with-o-above. Hint hint.

What's wrong with 004D 030A ? That's what it looks like to me.

~mark

Next message: Ernest Cline: "Re: Roman numismatic marks"
Previous message: Anousak Souphavanh: "UNICODE Lao translation?"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Roman numismatic marks"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: Roman (and other) numismatic marks"
Reply: Doug Ewell: "Re: Roman (and other) numismatic marks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 08 2004 - 18:38:38 CDT