From: Peter Kirk (email@example.com)
Date: Fri Jun 11 2004 - 14:01:34 CDT
On 11/06/2004 10:51, James Kass wrote:
>Doesn't this mean that it isn't possible to stack a combining circumflex
>above a combining spanning inverted breve? Does this mean we'd need
>double-wide clones of all the combining marks in order to support such
Sounds like the same problem we found with Hebrew nearly a year ago, and
solved by inserting CGJ to keep the non-canonical order which we needed.
Perhaps this is another suitable application for CGJ.
-- Peter Kirk firstname.lastname@example.org (personal) email@example.com (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 11 2004 - 14:03:13 CDT