From: John Jenkins (email@example.com)
Date: Fri Jun 11 2004 - 15:30:45 CDT
On Jun 11, 2004, at 1:20 PM, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
> It would have been nice if a better mechanism for expressing
> Han glyphic (and other types of) variants had been feasible
> and in place before CJK Extension B went in, but that is
> water under the bridge now. One can only hope that some
> restraint and use of alternative mechanisms will be shown
> in the current effort to define and encode additional CJK
> extensions, which involve even *less* useful characters, for
> the most part, missed even by the major dictionary compendia.
FWIW, I was able to give my demo on variation selectors on Han in
Chengdu after all, and I think it made the appropriate impression.
John H. Jenkins
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 11 2004 - 21:36:37 CDT