From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Aug 10 2004 - 13:07:09 CDT
W li¶cie z wto, 10-08-2004, godz. 18:33 +0100, Jon Hanna napisał:
> By the rules of XML replacing ≯ with U+226F would mean the document was
> no longer well-formed.
Really? I don't have a XML spec handy, but character references like
̸ can't be processed before parsing tags, because &60; is the
literal character "<", not the start of a tag.
-- __("< Marcin Kowalczyk \__/ email@example.com ^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 10 2004 - 13:08:12 CDT