From: D. Starner (email@example.com)
Date: Sun Sep 19 2004 - 20:09:44 CDT
Asmus Freytag writes:
> the nature of the symbol in question, I would personally see no reason to
> to encoding it - especially given the current and projected lack of
> of other alternatives.
It's a simple combining character. Even if you can't do arbitrary circles
around characters, you can take one character sequence and map it to the
glyph in a font. Systems that can't do even that need to be fixed.
-- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 19 2004 - 20:12:26 CDT