[Fwd: Re: Re: Relationship between Unicode and 10646]]

• Previous message: Rajesh Chandrakar: "International CALIBER2005 - Call for Paper Date extended till 15th December 2004!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: "Patrick Andries" <hapax@iquebec.com>
> Enfin, je ne suis plus si sûr que les sociétés américaines considèrent 
> encore
> Unicode comme quelque chose de stratégique, il s'agit surtout d'efforts 
> individuels
> de la part de techniciens passionés dans ces entreprises, passionnés qu'on 
> laisse
> encore faire sans doute parce que cela crée un bon capital de sympathie 
> multiculturel.

[PA] This was extracted from a longer and private message to Philippe. 
It is out of context here. Unicode is still strategic, the new scripts
may be less so to the major software companies although major software
companies will most probably not be able to ignore the new versions of 
Unicode which will contain more than simply new rare scripts. 

Anyways, this was a private discussion. Thanks, Philippe. Will teach me.

P. A.

• Next message: Otto Stolz: "Re: CGJ , RLM"
• Previous message: Rajesh Chandrakar: "International CALIBER2005 - Call for Paper Date extended till 15th December 2004!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 29 2004 - 07:08:51 CST