From: James Kass (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Dec 02 2004 - 10:13:22 CST
John Cowan wrote,
> In what, breadth of coverage or aesthetics? The GNU Unifont has very
> wide coverage though it is a bitmap font; James Kass's CODE 2000 and CODE
> 2001 probably have the widest coverage of any font, though it costs US$5
> to use them.
Code2001 is freeware.
> Both of them IMHO are a tad on the ugly side.
There's always room for improvement.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 19:45:13 CST