Re: current version of unicode-font

From: James Kass (
Date: Thu Dec 02 2004 - 10:13:22 CST

  • Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Nicest UTF"

    John Cowan wrote,

    > In what, breadth of coverage or aesthetics? The GNU Unifont has very
    > wide coverage though it is a bitmap font; James Kass's CODE 2000 and CODE
    > 2001 probably have the widest coverage of any font, though it costs US$5
    > to use them.

    Code2001 is freeware.

    > Both of them IMHO are a tad on the ugly side.

    There's always room for improvement.

    Best regards,

    James Kass

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 02 2004 - 19:45:13 CST