Re: Nicest UTF

From: Doug Ewell (
Date: Sun Dec 05 2004 - 02:03:41 CST

  • Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Nicest UTF"

    Asmus Freytag <asmusf at ix dot netcom dot com> wrote:

    > Given this little model and some additional assumptions about your
    > own project(s), you should be able to determine the 'nicest' UTF for
    > your own performance-critical case.

    This is absolutely correct. Each situation may have different needs and
    constraints, and these should govern which UTF is best suited for the
    task. No one UTF is better than the others in all cases.

    -Doug Ewell
     Fullerton, California

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Dec 05 2004 - 02:05:55 CST