From: Doug Ewell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Dec 05 2004 - 02:03:41 CST
Asmus Freytag <asmusf at ix dot netcom dot com> wrote:
> Given this little model and some additional assumptions about your
> own project(s), you should be able to determine the 'nicest' UTF for
> your own performance-critical case.
This is absolutely correct. Each situation may have different needs and
constraints, and these should govern which UTF is best suited for the
task. No one UTF is better than the others in all cases.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Dec 05 2004 - 02:05:55 CST