Re: Nicest UTF.. UTF-9, UTF-36, UTF-80, UTF-64, ...
From: Rick McGowan (rick@unicode.org)
Date: Tue Dec 07 2004 - 14:50:48 CST
Next message: John Hudson: "Re: proposals I wrote (and also, didn't write)"
- Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Nicest UTF.. UTF-9, UTF-36, UTF-80, UTF-64, ..."
- Maybe in reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Nicest UTF.. UTF-9, UTF-36, UTF-80, UTF-64, ..."
- Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Nicest UTF.. UTF-9, UTF-36, UTF-80, UTF-64, ..."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
> Yes, and pigs could fly, if they had big enough wings.
An 8-foot wingspan should do it. For picture of said flying pig see:
http://www.cincinnati.com/bigpiggig/profile_091700.html
http://www.cincinnati.com/bigpiggig/images/pig091700.jpg
Rick
- Next message: John Hudson: "Re: proposals I wrote (and also, didn't write)"
- Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Nicest UTF.. UTF-9, UTF-36, UTF-80, UTF-64, ..."
- Maybe in reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Nicest UTF.. UTF-9, UTF-36, UTF-80, UTF-64, ..."
- Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Nicest UTF.. UTF-9, UTF-36, UTF-80, UTF-64, ..."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Tue Dec 07 2004 - 14:52:54 CST