Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8

From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Mon Jan 17 2005 - 19:30:17 CST

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8"

Previous message: Hans Aberg: "Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8"
In reply to: Hans Aberg: "Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8"
Next in thread: Hans Aberg: "RE: 32'nd bit & UTF-8"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 04:19 PM 1/17/2005, Hans Aberg wrote:
>At 11:12 -0800 2005/01/17, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
> >> Are there any good reasons for UTF-32 to exclude the 32'nd bit of an
> encoded
> >> 4-byte?

10646 is defined only for 31 bits.

A./

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8"
Previous message: Hans Aberg: "Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8"
In reply to: Hans Aberg: "Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8"
Next in thread: Hans Aberg: "RE: 32'nd bit & UTF-8"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 17 2005 - 19:30:25 CST