From: Lars Kristan (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Jan 22 2005 - 11:22:40 CST
Philippe Verdy wrote:
> > Not that I believe that, but I've been told to process UNIX
> > as
> > binary data. Guess the same is then true for Windows
> filenames. Nice.
> You are completely wrong here!
OK, who is wrong? I said I don't believe it. Whoever told me that must be
My understanding would be that filenames are text when there can be no
invalid sequences or characters in them. I've just created a file containing
U+FFFF on NTFS. Now tell me how to process the filenames using a conformant
Unicode application. I cannot, hence I deduct that this is not text and
should be treated as binary data.
> Never assume, even on Unix, that filenames are binary safe.
Let's get one thing straight. I can make every effort to feed text data when
creating filenames, and act on any other restrictions. But if the filesystem
cannot guarantee that it will only feed me text data, then I have no other
option than to store the retrieved data in binary format. Or use a
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 22 2005 - 11:25:21 CST