Re: UTF-8 'BOM'

From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Sun Jan 23 2005 - 17:15:30 CST

Next message: Arcane Jill: "RE: Subject: Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8"

Previous message: Lars Kristan: "RE: UTF-8 'BOM' (was RE: Subject: Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8)"
In reply to: Hans Aberg: "Re: UTF-8 'BOM'"
Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: UTF-8 'BOM'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 06:14 AM 1/20/2005, Hans Aberg wrote:
>Actually, other posters said it was the other way around. MS did invent
>BOM's for use with UTF-16, and decided it was practical in UTF-8. Unicode

Actually, you don't know what you are talking about.

The BOM was invented by WordPerfect.

A./

Next message: Arcane Jill: "RE: Subject: Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8"
Previous message: Lars Kristan: "RE: UTF-8 'BOM' (was RE: Subject: Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8)"
In reply to: Hans Aberg: "Re: UTF-8 'BOM'"
Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: UTF-8 'BOM'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 24 2005 - 11:11:48 CST