Re: UTF-8 'BOM'

From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Tue Jan 25 2005 - 00:49:57 CST

Next message: Michael Everson: "New Balinese proposal available."

Previous message: Curtis Clark: "Re: I Heart Huckabees"
In reply to: Philippe VERDY: "Re: leading BOMs in encoding schemes (was: Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

A lot of the confusion and misinformation that surrounds this topic
could be avoided if people would stop talking about UTF-8 having a "byte
order mark," and start talking about UTF-8 having a "signature."

-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/

Next message: Michael Everson: "New Balinese proposal available."
Previous message: Curtis Clark: "Re: I Heart Huckabees"
In reply to: Philippe VERDY: "Re: leading BOMs in encoding schemes (was: Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 25 2005 - 01:26:38 CST