From: Hans Aberg (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Jan 27 2005 - 11:56:20 CST
At 10:57 -0800 2005/01/26, Rick McGowan wrote:
>> Should not the in effect empty Unicode points, U+D800 to U+DFFF,
>> as well as U+FFFE and U+FFFF, be filled with characters?
>The codepoints are not open for encoding. They are not "empty". Their
>interpretation is already specified in the standard.
Their semantic interpretation is the same as that of empty slots, though
promised not to be filled.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 27 2005 - 12:09:42 CST