Re: Surrogate points

From: Hans Aberg (haberg@math.su.se)
Date: Mon Jan 31 2005 - 12:24:22 CST

  • Next message: Hans Aberg: "Re: Surrogate points"

    At 12:03 -0800 2005/01/30, Peter Constable wrote:
    >What's the point of this? The design works, has lots of successful
    >implementations, ...

    The design is utterly confusing, and needs to be straightened out.

    >...and isn't going to be changed.

    So sit there in your pile of dirt.

    >Hence, complaining
    >serves no purpose; it's simply whining. Instead of wasting time on
    >fruitless discussion, we should rather occupy ourselves with discussing
    >things that are changeable and have a real need to be changed.

    Things are changeable, if one wants them to be. If you don't want any
    changes, why bothering replying?

      Hans Aberg



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 31 2005 - 12:26:05 CST