From: Michael Everson (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Feb 12 2005 - 03:18:55 CST
At 22:42 -0800 2005-02-11, Doug Ewell wrote:
> > To my surprise the code charts do not seem to indicate that Cyrillic
>> and Latin "a" are related. There is clearly an embarrassing gap in my
>> understanding here - what am I missing?
>They aren't related, except historically. Unicode doesn't care that
>they look the same.
Inconsistent re: KU and WE.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Feb 12 2005 - 03:20:38 CST