From: Doug Ewell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Feb 21 2005 - 09:44:23 CST
Peter Kirk <peterkirk at qaya dot org> wrote:
> Now I'm sure Unicode wouldn't want to encode any new
> characters just because they are found in logos. But that doesn't mean
> need to deny that some logos do include characters.
I assume you mean somebody else, because that was exactly what I said:
the IBM logo consists entirely of Unicode characters. That does not
make the IBM logo a candidate for encoding. I think I misunderstood
you, and thought by "not out of scope" you meant that the AEG logo might
be a candidate for encoding.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 21 2005 - 09:45:47 CST