Re: orthographies

From: Doug Ewell (
Date: Mon Feb 21 2005 - 09:44:23 CST

  • Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: orthographies"

    Peter Kirk <peterkirk at qaya dot org> wrote:

    > Now I'm sure Unicode wouldn't want to encode any new
    > characters just because they are found in logos. But that doesn't mean
    > need to deny that some logos do include characters.

    I assume you mean somebody else, because that was exactly what I said:
    the IBM logo consists entirely of Unicode characters. That does not
    make the IBM logo a candidate for encoding. I think I misunderstood
    you, and thought by "not out of scope" you meant that the AEG logo might
    be a candidate for encoding.

    -Doug Ewell
     Fullerton, California

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 21 2005 - 09:45:47 CST