From: Kenneth Whistler (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Mar 02 2005 - 14:41:33 CST
> Kenneth Whistler writes:
> > Yes. See 101-C30 and 101-A106 in:
> > http://www.unicode.org/consortium/utc-minutes/UTC-101-200411.html
> > The final resolution of this is still pending for the 4.1.0
> > data files, but the issue is being tracked.
> These are for U+06C3, not U+0629 which is the character Greg is asking
Ah yes, that is correct. The problem with U+06C3 is with
regards to its joining *group* (with respect to U+06C2),
and is independent of the argument regarding the
right- versus dual-joining of U+0629 teh marbuta itself.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 02 2005 - 14:43:12 CST