Date: Sat Mar 05 2005 - 07:30:19 CST
Did I not read somewhere that ZWJ is "really" only intended for Indic
ligatures? I thought I saw something like that, and CGJ was "better" for Latin
(etc.)... Total hallucination?
Peter Kirk wrote:
> No. The correct character to use to promote a ligature in such cases is
> not CGJ but ZWJ. See the clear discussion of this in the Unicode
> standard. A smart font should be able to deal with this.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 05 2005 - 07:16:52 CST