From: John Hudson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Mar 22 2005 - 20:10:56 CST
Mark E. Shoulson wrote:
> Just one more time: Unicode isn't a font; take up your problem with the
> designers of the fonts in question.
Further to that: the typographic needs of linguists differ from the typographic
conventions of typical publishing, hence you need to use specialised fonts that maintain
semantically important distinctions across type styles.
-- Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com Vancouver, BC email@example.com Currently reading: A century of philosophy, by Hans Georg Gadamer David Jones: artist and poet, ed. Paul Hills
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 22 2005 - 20:13:08 CST