Re: 'lower case a' and 'script a' in unicode

From: Werner LEMBERG (wl@gnu.org)
Date: Fri Mar 25 2005 - 15:54:17 CST

Next message: Mark Leisher: "UCData 2.9 released"

Previous message: Erik van der Poel: "Re: Security Issues"
In reply to: Peter Constable: "RE: 'lower case a' and 'script a' in unicode"
Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: 'lower case a' and 'script a' in unicode"
Maybe reply: Philippe VERDY: "Re: Re: 'lower case a' and 'script a' in unicode"
Reply: Peter Kirk: "Re: 'lower case a' and 'script a' in unicode"
Reply: Rick McGowan: "Re: 'lower case a' and 'script a' in unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> http://www.gutenberg.eu.org/pub/GUTenberg/publicationsPDF/10-knappen.pdf
> >
> > Here a much more readable version of this document (using real fonts)
> >
> > http://www.uni-mainz.de/~knappen/euro_rev.ps
>
> I'm just curious: in what way for the average user a PS file is
> going to be more readable than a PDF file?

The above pdf file contains *images* of the article (which has been
scanned with low resolution), while the PS file has been directly
translated from the LaTeX source.

Werner

Next message: Mark Leisher: "UCData 2.9 released"
Previous message: Erik van der Poel: "Re: Security Issues"
In reply to: Peter Constable: "RE: 'lower case a' and 'script a' in unicode"
Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: 'lower case a' and 'script a' in unicode"
Maybe reply: Philippe VERDY: "Re: Re: 'lower case a' and 'script a' in unicode"
Reply: Peter Kirk: "Re: 'lower case a' and 'script a' in unicode"
Reply: Rick McGowan: "Re: 'lower case a' and 'script a' in unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 25 2005 - 16:30:15 CST