From: Mark Davis (mark.davis@jtcsv.com)
Date: Mon Mar 28 2005 - 14:15:12 CST
Ken is most likely right; but it'd be better to test them to be sure.
Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth Whistler" <kenw@sybase.com>
To: <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Cc: <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 11:08
Subject: Re: ISO character sets stable under NFC?
> Elliotte Rusty Harold asked:
>
> > Question:
> >
> > Aside from 8859-1, which, if any, of the ISO 8859 character sets are
> > stable under normalization form C?
>
> It should be *all* of them.
>
> --Ken
>
> >
> > For example, suppose I have a string of Unicode characters, each of
> > which is defined in ISO-8859-2. I then normalize this string according
> > to NFC. Is it guaranteed that the resulting string will be
> > character-per-character identical to the original string?
> >
> > I believe this is true for 8859-1. Is it true for any of the other 8859
> > character sets?
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 28 2005 - 14:16:32 CST