From: Alexander Kh. (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue May 17 2005 - 00:07:34 CDT
Kenneth Whistler wrote:
> What *that* means is that discussion of the formal character
> names is academic at this point -- they are no longer proposals,
> but are published and immutable.
When the Unicode standard becomes too "academic", it is never too
early or too late to create a new precise standard. I suppose I am
talking to an old man who does not believe that he will outlive the
current "immutable" standard.
-- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 17 2005 - 00:08:49 CDT