Re: SMTP and unicode

• Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re[2]: Corrections to Glagolitic"
• In reply to: Otto Stolz: "Re: SMTP and unicode"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 20:52 +0200 2005/05/17, Otto Stolz wrote:
>faraz siddiqi schrieb:
>>is smtp by default support utf-8 encoding
>
>Not exactly. SMTP supports 7-bit transmission, but there are ways around this
>limitation.

So here is a standard that yet has not had the sense of becoming 8-bit. See
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMTP

At 17:38 +0000 2005/05/17, faraz siddiqi wrote:
>i am making an email editor for urdu from which my client wants to
>relay emails in urdu language its all right now i want to ask that i
>have written

Also see
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urdu
for some Urdu links.

-- 
   Hans Aberg

• Next message: Hans Aberg: "Re: SMTP and unicode"
• Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re[2]: Corrections to Glagolitic"
• In reply to: Otto Stolz: "Re: SMTP and unicode"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 17 2005 - 15:23:06 CDT