Re: ASCII and Unicode lifespan

From: James Kass (jameskass@att.net)
Date: Fri May 20 2005 - 07:53:53 CDT

  • Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: ASCII and Unicode lifespan"

    From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk@qaya.org>

    > Well, Klingon has been rejected, but Deseret and Shavian have been
    > encoded although I am unaware of any non-fantasy use of these scripts,
    > and Tengwar and Cirth, which are certainly fantasy scripts, are roadmapped.

    Why do you consider Deseret and Shavian to be fantasy scripts?

    Best regards,

    James Kass



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 20 2005 - 07:54:54 CDT