From: Tom Emerson (tree@basistech.com)
Date: Mon May 23 2005 - 09:07:18 CDT
Dean Snyder writes:
> Encoding existing scripts is not proliferation.
Amen.
> Transliteration is lossy.
Not necessarily. Transcription is by definitionlossy. However, it is
possible to develop a transliteration scheme that is not lossy: the
Buckwalter transliteration for Arabic is not lossy for contemporary
Arabic orthography (though it is not suitable for Qur'anic.) Similarly
the KORDA transcription for Han'gul is also lossless for contemporary
Korean orthography.
-tree
-- Tom Emerson Basis Technology Corp. Software Architect http://www.basistech.com "Beware the lollipop of mediocrity: lick it once and you suck forever"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 23 2005 - 09:08:13 CDT