From: Doug Ewell (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Jun 01 2005 - 09:51:35 CDT
Hans Aberg <haberg at math dot su dot se> wrote:
>> The characters above were added for backward compatibility with
>> existing character sets. This is known and undisputed, and is not
>> due to alternative interpretations of the character-glyph model.
> Implicit in my statement is that one can do such an interpretation if
> one wants Unicode to move forward with respect to this issue.
"Move forward" in what way? By encoding more precomposed Latin
-- Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 01 2005 - 09:53:26 CDT