Re: Ligatures fi and ffi (was: Re: Glagolitic in Unicode 4.1)

From: Doug Ewell (
Date: Wed Jun 01 2005 - 09:51:35 CDT

  • Next message: Antoine Leca: "Re: Ligatures fi and ffi"

    Hans Aberg <haberg at math dot su dot se> wrote:

    >> The characters above were added for backward compatibility with
    >> existing character sets. This is known and undisputed, and is not
    >> due to alternative interpretations of the character-glyph model.
    > Implicit in my statement is that one can do such an interpretation if
    > one wants Unicode to move forward with respect to this issue.

    "Move forward" in what way? By encoding more precomposed Latin

    Doug Ewell
    Fullerton, California

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 01 2005 - 09:53:26 CDT