Re: Ligatures fi and ffi

From: Jon Hanna (jon@hackcraft.net)
Date: Wed Jun 01 2005 - 11:44:28 CDT

  • Next message: Hans Aberg: "Re: AW: Ligatures fi and ffi"

    Hans Aberg wrote:
    > If one so wants, one can add all the glyphs one wants, adding a property
    > field saying that it is a rendering character.

    No, we cannot. That would completely change the scope and purpose of
    Unicode.

    --
    Regards,
    Jon Hanna
    "I started to accept the mess I'm in. I know that mess spelled backwards 
    is ssem and I felt much better armed with that information."
    - Tori Amos
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 01 2005 - 11:45:18 CDT