From: Doug Ewell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Jun 18 2005 - 12:28:57 CDT
Ahmad Gharbeia <gharbeia at gmail dot com> wrote:
> Yes, all the cases described as justifications for the need for glyph
> colouring within normal typesetting.
> This is how subjects like grammar, morphology, orthography, gender
> endings, plural types, etc. were taught to us as children.
Bold, italics, underlining, changes in font size and style, etc. are all
used for pedagogical and other communicative purposes. But they are not
plain text either.
-- Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jun 18 2005 - 12:30:47 CDT