Re: A Tamil-Roman transliterator (Unicode)

From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Tue Jun 28 2005 - 22:09:27 CDT

Next message: Eric Muller: "Measuring a writing system "economy"/"accuracy""

Previous message: Sinnathurai Srivas: "Re: Tamil sha (U+0BB6) - deprecate it?"
In reply to: Sinnathurai Srivas: "Re: A Tamil-Roman transliterator (Unicode)"
Next in thread: Sinnathurai Srivas: "Re: A Tamil-Roman transliterator (Unicode)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Sinnathurai Srivas <sisrivas at blueyonder dot co dot uk> wrote:

> Numbered consonant is an illegal method, encoded by Unicode with no
> concern for any proper study.
> ...
> Every Tom Dick and Harry can not messup Tamil. Unicode should not
> legitimise this illegal intrusion.

Stop using this word "illegal" unless you can back it up. Character
encoding is not governed by national laws.

--
Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/

Next message: Eric Muller: "Measuring a writing system "economy"/"accuracy""
Previous message: Sinnathurai Srivas: "Re: Tamil sha (U+0BB6) - deprecate it?"
In reply to: Sinnathurai Srivas: "Re: A Tamil-Roman transliterator (Unicode)"
Next in thread: Sinnathurai Srivas: "Re: A Tamil-Roman transliterator (Unicode)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 28 2005 - 22:11:09 CDT