Re: Tamil sha (U+0BB6) - deprecate it?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Wed Jun 29 2005 - 04:38:19 CDT

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Measuring a writing system "economy"/"accuracy""

Previous message: Erkki Kolehmainen: "Re: [Fwd: Re: A Tamil-Roman transliterator (Unicode)]]"
In reply to: Sinnathurai Srivas: "Re: Tamil sha (U+0BB6) - deprecate it?"
Next in thread: Patrick Andries: "Re: Tamil sha (U+0BB6) - deprecate it?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Sarasvati, please end this thread. U+0BB6 was properly encoded on the
basis of evidence of its use, and was approved by the Unicode
Technical Committee and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2.

Thank you.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Measuring a writing system "economy"/"accuracy""
Previous message: Erkki Kolehmainen: "Re: [Fwd: Re: A Tamil-Roman transliterator (Unicode)]]"
In reply to: Sinnathurai Srivas: "Re: Tamil sha (U+0BB6) - deprecate it?"
Next in thread: Patrick Andries: "Re: Tamil sha (U+0BB6) - deprecate it?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 29 2005 - 05:21:58 CDT