Re: Old Hebrew, extra Uniscribe work (Re: Arabic encoding model (alas, static!))

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Thu Jul 07 2005 - 09:36:56 CDT

Next message: asadek@st-elias.com: "Re: Old Hebrew, extra Uniscribe work (Re: Arabic encoding model (alas, static!))"

Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Arabic encoding model (alas, static!)"
In reply to: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Old Hebrew, extra Uniscribe work (Re: Arabic encoding model (alas, static!))"
Next in thread: John Hudson: "Re: Old Hebrew, extra Uniscribe work (Re: Arabic encoding model (alas, static!))"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 09:54 -0400 2005-07-07, Mark E. Shoulson wrote:

>PleaseOhPlease not again. Read the archives for why Phoenician is
>subject non grata on this forum.

My comments were not about Phoenician per se. They were general
comments about glyph substitution and about scholarly scripts in
general, and would have applied equally to Syriac or Linear B.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: asadek@st-elias.com: "Re: Old Hebrew, extra Uniscribe work (Re: Arabic encoding model (alas, static!))"
Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Arabic encoding model (alas, static!)"
In reply to: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Old Hebrew, extra Uniscribe work (Re: Arabic encoding model (alas, static!))"
Next in thread: John Hudson: "Re: Old Hebrew, extra Uniscribe work (Re: Arabic encoding model (alas, static!))"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 07 2005 - 09:43:18 CDT