From: Dean Snyder (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Jul 06 2005 - 22:14:27 CDT
Peter Constable wrote at 11:56 AM on Wednesday, July 6, 2005:
>I don't know the answer to these questions. I wonder, though, what the
>intent of the question is.
The intent of my questions is to uncover the facts behind Erkki
Kolehmainen bald assertion that "it would be grossly unfair and
misleading to characterize [WG2] as a rubberstamping organization."
>Suppose there has *never* been an instance in which WG2 rejected a
>UTC recommendation. What would you derive from that?
I would assert that the burden of proof is on you and others to
establish that the WG2 is not a rubber stamp of the UTC.
Dean A. Snyder
Assistant Research Scholar
Manager, Digital Hammurabi Project
Computer Science Department
Whiting School of Engineering
218C New Engineering Building
3400 North Charles Street
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, USA 21218
office: 410 516-6850
cell: 717 817-4897
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 07 2005 - 11:29:32 CDT