From: Patrick Andries (email@example.com)
Date: Fri Jul 08 2005 - 13:48:54 CDT
Patrick Andries a écrit :
> John Hudson a écrit :
>> I basically agree, and withdraw my suggestion. The risk of seeing two
>> bars would be easily avoided in a font that included the bar in the
>> SHIMA SIMA glyph, but I accept Michael's argument about consistency
>> within Coptic *as encoded*. If I'd been involved earlier, I might
>> have queried the need for the SHIMA SIMA character at all, but there
>> it is,
> Canada opposed its inclusion (but accepted other abbreviations) and
> remained unconvinced at the end of the ad hoc meeting.
Sorry: other symbols, but they were only explained in a single sentence
as abbreviations in the proposal, after the adhoc we accepted them as
symbols, but we opposed the SHIMA SIMA since it is a regular abbreviation.
<http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/N2926.pdf> page 3.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jul 08 2005 - 13:50:01 CDT