Re: Proofreading fonts

From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Mon Jul 11 2005 - 00:52:44 CDT

  • Next message: Theo Veenker: "Re: CLDR plural handling info?"

    Gregg,

    I think asking proofreaders to proof the underlying encoding is backwards.
    If the task is to ensure a preferred encoding, the best approach is to use
    software, whether a Perl script for plain text files with markup or a macro
    inside an editor that produces a proprietary binary format.

    After all, differences in *encoding* is something that software is easily
    made aware of, where as differences in *spelling* still require human proofing.

    A./



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 11 2005 - 00:53:52 CDT