Re: Letters for Indic transliteration

From: Andreas Prilop (nhtcapri@rrzn-user.uni-hannover.de)
Date: Tue Jul 19 2005 - 09:34:56 CDT

  • Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: Letters for Indic transliteration"

    On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Michael Everson wrote:

    >> I propose to add (at least) four letters:
    >> - R with ring below
    >> - r with ring below
    >> - L with ring below
    >> - l with ring below
    >> in "Latin Extended Additional".
    >
    > That can't be done because of normalization.

    I do not understand this sentence.
    Can you (or someone else) please explain what you mean by these words?

    How did the other letters get into this block?



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 19 2005 - 09:35:48 CDT