From: Andreas Prilop (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Jul 19 2005 - 11:10:55 CDT
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Raymond Mercier wrote:
>> 090B 098B 0D0B R with ring below -- --
>> 095C 09DC -- R with dot below 1E5A 1E5B
> This distinction between dot-below and ring-below does not reflect the
> Nagari or other Indian script, but is just an accidental glyph variant in
> latin transcriptions.
No; see above. One is U+090B and one is U+095C.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 19 2005 - 11:11:44 CDT