Re: Letters for Indic transliteration

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Wed Jul 20 2005 - 17:40:09 CDT

  • Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: Letters for Indic transliteration"

    At 14:38 -0700 2005-07-20, Mark Davis wrote:
    >
    >First, ISO uses the term 'transliteration' to
    >mean a reverseable transformation, and
    >'transliteration' to mean a non-reversable one.

    What?

    I am sure this is not correct.

    -- 
    Michael Everson
    Convener, ISO TC46/WG3
    Conversion of Written Languages
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 20 2005 - 17:43:32 CDT