Re: VCR technical symbols?

From: David Starner (
Date: Sun Aug 28 2005 - 13:14:29 CDT

  • Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: Status of UAX #14: where is the current normative version?"

    On 8/28/05, Johannes Bergerhausen <> wrote:
    > Am 27.08.2005 um 19:20 schrieb Curtis Clark:
    > > To me, the criterion has always been "Does it need to be exchanged
    > > electronically in plain text?"
    > That's a good and clear criterion.

    I don't think it's a terribly clear criterion.
    > And of course technical symbols (like the worldwide spread play, pause,
    > skip, etc.)
    > need to be exchanged electronically in plain text.

    Because I don't see that "of course" at all, and looking above,
    there's a lot of disagreement. A case could be made for, yes, but a
    case could be made against, too. They're a set of little standardized
    pictures, which is always a marginal case.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 28 2005 - 14:01:45 CDT