From: David Starner (email@example.com)
Date: Sun Aug 28 2005 - 13:14:29 CDT
On 8/28/05, Johannes Bergerhausen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Am 27.08.2005 um 19:20 schrieb Curtis Clark:
> > To me, the criterion has always been "Does it need to be exchanged
> > electronically in plain text?"
> That's a good and clear criterion.
I don't think it's a terribly clear criterion.
> And of course technical symbols (like the worldwide spread play, pause,
> skip, etc.)
> need to be exchanged electronically in plain text.
Because I don't see that "of course" at all, and looking above,
there's a lot of disagreement. A case could be made for, yes, but a
case could be made against, too. They're a set of little standardized
pictures, which is always a marginal case.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 28 2005 - 14:01:45 CDT