From: Patrick Andries (patrick.andries@xcential.com)
Date: Sun Sep 11 2005 - 00:12:05 CDT
Michael Everson a écrit :
>
>> Moreover, we would have avoided security issues with these kinds of
>> characters at the same time. See the examples in
>> http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr36/#Single_Script_Spoofing
>
>
> Um, well, the security issues are your bugaboo, and they are
> restricted to a narrow range of activity vis à vis the UCS.
Let's not make things too personal.
You know other people are also concerned and disapprove of duplicating
similar-looking and similar-behaving (viz. havings same Unicode
properties) combining characters (for instance in a script and in the
generic combining characters).
I do not want to argue this here. But only mention we should not get
personal (in an otherwise interesting discussion as far as I'm concerned).
P. A.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 11 2005 - 00:15:14 CDT