From: Richard Wordingham (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Sep 11 2005 - 05:26:20 CDT
Is there any reason for not adding what appears to be a 2-dot visarga to the
Tamil script? While, FWIW, I have no evidence that it occurs in Tamil, it
frequently occurs in Sanskrit and Saurashtra texts written in the Tamil
scripts. There are three issues that I can see:
1) It seems that some writers simply use the similar looking colon (U+003A).
I believe it is regarded as bad practice to use this sort of punctuation as
a letter. The 2-dot visarga occurs word-internally in Saurashtra.
2) It might possibly be a glyph variant of aytham. That seems unlikely -
has anyone examples of them both appearing, ideally in the same font, in
text that is a mixture of the Sanskrit and Tamil languages or the Saurashtra
and Tamil languages?
3) Spoofing and IDN. ASCII colon and the Tamil-script 2-dot visarga are
very similar. However, would a colon be allowed inside a Tamil script name?
The description of the character should probably say something like
'Sanskrit, Saurashtra, not Tamil'. I'd prefer something stronger, like
'Indic languages, not Dravidian', but:
(a) I'm not sure it's actually true.
(b) Many people don't know the use of 'Indic' to refer to a family of
Indo-European languages, and using it would be as confusing to some as the
true statement, 'Strine is not an Australian language'. ('Strine' = English
as spoken in Australia; 'Australian' = to do with the Australian language
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 11 2005 - 05:27:51 CDT