From: Doug Ewell (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Oct 17 2005 - 20:38:49 CST
Philippe Verdy <verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr> wrote:
> This should be an exception to the rule of immutability of normative
> character names, because this is an editorial error that should not
> have happened.
Surely no more so than U+1D0C5.
It wouldn't matter if the name were LAO LETTER FOO BAR; character names
don't get changed.
-- Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Oct 17 2005 - 20:42:41 CST