From: Hans Aberg (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Nov 28 2005 - 11:20:39 CST
On 28 Nov 2005, at 15:30, Doug Ewell wrote:
>>>> Most facts points to that the Unicode/10646 is a human interface,
>>>> not a computer to computer  interface.
> ...I mean saying that "Unicode/10646 is a human interface." It's a
> coded character set.
I abbreviated "human to human interface and human to computer
interface" to "human interface", as I felt that the former was too
long. Sorry if some clarity was missed out by that.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 28 2005 - 18:09:39 CST