RE: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Wed Dec 07 2005 - 04:45:37 CST

Next message: Raymond Mercier: "Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"

Previous message: Ray Mullan: "Unsubscribe"
Maybe in reply to: Deborah Goldsmith: "CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"
Next in thread: Tony Jollans: "RE: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 21:38 -0800 2005-12-06, Peter Constable wrote:
>And why I tend to favour yyyy-mm-dd (AFAIK, nobody ever uses yyyy-dd-mm).

I favour that too, and always use it on my own computer, whatever my
locale may suggest. :-)

-- 
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Raymond Mercier: "Re: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"
Previous message: Ray Mullan: "Unsubscribe"
Maybe in reply to: Deborah Goldsmith: "CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"
Next in thread: Tony Jollans: "RE: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 07 2005 - 04:53:17 CST