RE: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Thu Dec 08 2005 - 14:44:36 CST

  • Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "RE: CLDR: 2 vs. 4 digit years in US?"

    At 19:33 +0000 2005-12-08, Tony Jollans wrote:
    >
    >> I'll wager that, when presented with 08/12/05, more people would feel
    >> motivated go to their settings and change it to 2005, than would be the
    >> case for people presented with 08/12/2005 who would go to remove the
    >> century.
    >
    >Probably. But, when forced to type 2005 instead of 05, would that still be
    >the case?

    CLDR presents data to the interface. It isn't an input scheme.

    -- 
    Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 08 2005 - 15:07:37 CST