Re: Cyrillic "borrowed" letterforms

From: Andreas Prilop (nhtcapri@rrzn-user.uni-hannover.de)
Date: Fri Jan 06 2006 - 09:05:55 CST

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Cyrillic "borrowed" letterforms"

Previous message: Tom Emerson: "Re: Sending file name containing unicode characters in http file download"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: Cyrillic "borrowed" letterforms"
Reply: Doug Ewell: "Re: Cyrillic "borrowed" letterforms"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin wrote:

> Sure thing, but hardely usual in a non-cursive non-italics typeface as in
> the mentioned example <http://www.gov.khakasnet.ru/images/title.gif>.

This [Serbian] glyph variant has been included in all of Adobe's
Cyrillic fonts since the beginning (~ 1991). See Adobe TechNote 5013
http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/font/index.html
http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/en/font/5013.Cyrillic_Font_Spec.pdf
Section 4.2 and Appendix A "glyph afii10064".

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Cyrillic "borrowed" letterforms"
Previous message: Tom Emerson: "Re: Sending file name containing unicode characters in http file download"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: Cyrillic "borrowed" letterforms"
Reply: Doug Ewell: "Re: Cyrillic "borrowed" letterforms"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 06 2006 - 10:37:41 CST